Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Eduardo Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Eduardo Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Nava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 52.4% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 56.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 61.25% of matches played (W/L 49/ 31), with Nava winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Nava has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Nava winning 1. The last match between Broom and Nava was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 30-10-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Charles Broom getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:2:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Nava have played a deciding set 1 times, with Broom winning 1 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 1, and Nava 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.66 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 36.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Nava
313
Rank
313
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
842
Rank
792
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
63% (205-118)
Career Total W/L
54% (77-66)
63% (20-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Eduardo Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:2:40 | 3:2:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (63/112) | 55% (82/149) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (50/63) | 73% (60/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (22/49) | 43% (29/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (3/18) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (60/149) | 36% (40/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Eduardo Nava
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
82 of
149)
14
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
10
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
60 of
82)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
132
Total Points Won
129
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Eduardo Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (20/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (392/354) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 198 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 203.78 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1497/2329) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1054/1497) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (436/832) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (99/268) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1030/2519) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (20/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Eduardo Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Eduardo Nava
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Brandon Carpico
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Filippo Moroni
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Jesse Flores
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Eduardo Nava
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
82 of
149)
14
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
10
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
60 of
82)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
132
Total Points Won
129
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Eduardo Nava
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Donald Young
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Eduardo Nava
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
10
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Eduardo Nava
63%
(
83 of
132)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
